Walter Rauschenbusch: Social Gospel Prophet
Walter Rauschenbusch (1861-1918 ) is one of the greatest of Baptist theologians and too often vilified by self-styled conservatives. Born in Rochester, NY, Walter was the son of August Rauschenbusch, an immigrant German Baptist pastor. August was one of the founders of the German Baptist Convention in North America, now called the North American Baptist Conference and no longer an ethnic denomination.
Walter was educated both in the U.S. public schools and in the Gutersloh Gymnasium in Germany. He graduated from the University of Rochester (B.A., 1884) & Rochester Theological Seminary (1886) with additional graduate study in Germany. He volunteered to be a missionary for the Northern Baptist Convention (now American Baptist Churches, USA), but was rejected because of doubts about the orthodoxy of his views on the atonement (the mission agency considered him too subjective in his view).
For 11 years (1886-1897), Rauschenbusch was pastor of Second German Baptist Church in the “Hell’s Kitchen” area of New York City, a section of the city now called “Clinton.” There he encountered the ravages of the industrial revolution: poverty, unemployment, insecurity, malnutrition, disease, and crime. Rauschenbusch became active in social reform. Finding his inherited pietist theology (stressing individual conversion and salvation and expecting society to be changed automatically by redeemed individuals) to be inadequate, Rauschenbush became one of the founders of what came to be known as “The Social Gospel.”
The Social Gospel has been criticized for neglecting individual salvation. However accurate that description may be for others, it is false when applied to Rauschenbusch. He sought to revive the full gospel with both individual and social salvation. Influenced by the German theologian Albrecht Ritschl (1822-1889), Rauschenbusch helped to recover the centrality of Jesus’ proclamation of the “Kingdom of God.” In Rauschenbusch’s life and faith, the individual and social dimensions of salvation were never separated.
Growing deafness led him to accept a call to leave his congregation and return to Rochester Theological Seminary to teach in the German department in 1897 and become Professor of Church History (English and German departments) in 1902. His most significant writings include Christianity and the Social Crisis (1907) which, unfortunately, sounds remarkably contemporary, Christianizing the Social Order (1912), which presented a program of progressive, democratic reformism as moving society closer to the Kingdom of God on earth (defined as “the progressive transformation of all human affairs by the thought and spirit of Christ.”), A Theology for the Social Gospel (1917); For God and the People: Prayers of the Social Awakening (1910), The Social Principles of Jesus (1916). He died of cancer in 1918.
If conservative Christians criticize the Social Gospel for neglecting individual salvation (not true of Rauschenbusch), later progressives have criticized it for holding to Victorian family models which subordinate women, and neglecting the issues of race and war. Rauschenbusch’s writings show awareness of the problem of racism, but it is true that this issue did not become central for him (unlike for some Southerners influenced by him such as Henlee H. Barnette or T. B. Maston). He also wrote little about war and peace, but his distress over WWI (in which the nations he loved, the U.S. and Germany, were at war!) did lead him to study the biblical question of war and become a pacifist late in his life. Many, if not most, of Rauschenbusch’s students became pacifists and active members of the Fellowship of Reconciliation. He completely shared the Victorian family views of his age, however, showing that even prophets fail to transcend their era in everything.
Still, the judgment of Martin Luther King, Jr. remains true: “Rauschenbusch gave to American Protestantism a sense of social responsibility that it should never lose.” (From King’s essay, “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence.” ) The real Rauschenbusch, not the stereotypes, should become a vital conversation partner in contemporary churches.
For further information on Rauschenbusch’s life see Paul M. Minus, Walter Rauschenbusch: American Reformer (Macmillan, 1988); Christopher H. Evans, The Kingdom is Always But Coming: A Life of Walter Rauschenbusch (Eerdmans, 2004).
5 Comments »
Leave a comment
About
Michael L. Westmoreland-White, Ph.D. I live in Louisville, KY USA with my wife, Kate, and our two wonderful daughters. My wife, Kate, is a Baptist minister. Our daughters are Molly (’95) and Miriam (’99). I am a former soldier converted to gospel nonviolence and a once (and future?) academic theologian turned peace activist, author, and peace educator. Contact me at mlw-w@insightbb.com
The Levellers were a 17th C. movement during the English Civil War. They were a religiously-inspired political movement for democracy, human rights, justice for the poor, and peace. Their strongest leader was Richard Overton, a pacifist General Baptist influenced by Dutch Mennonites. In the spirit of Overton and the Levellers, this is a series of “Leveller Manifestos” for 21st C. U.S. life.
Rules for commenting on this blog: 1) Respect everyone, even when you disagree strongly. 2) Keep comments relatively short. If you need a long post on your own blog, I’ll follow you there to see what more you have to say. 3) Stay on topic, please. 4) Don’t hog the conversation; let others have a turn. Failure to follow these simple rules could lead me to removing your comment(s).
![[PDA - Pledge For Peace - Sign the Petition.]](http://pdamerica.org/images/ads/P4P_button.jpg)
I think the biggest lesson that I learned from reading Evan’s biography of W.R. is that even prophets have cultural blind spots. While W.R. was certainly a social progressive in his day, he was also racist, sexist, nationalistic, and paternalistic towards the poor. While it would be anachronistic to hold W.R. accountable to today’s standards of equality on these issues, his life serves as a warning to 21st century progressives to be wary of our own cultural blindspots that lead us to practice -isms in ways that we might often be unaware of.
Thanks for posting this, Michael!
Daniel, I think Evans is spot-on about the sexism and paternalism. Rauschenbusch came from a very patriarchal and patrician background. I think Evans overdoes the nationalistic charge: A real nationalist would have not had any problems with WWI and they didn’t.
The racism charge is more complex. I think Rauschenbusch was paternalistic in his concern for African-Americans–as were most liberals of his day–but he certainly wasn’t racist by the standards of the day. What is very true is that he neglected race, as did much of the Social Gospel. Even Reinhold Niebuhr showed more attention to racism as a national problem than Rauschenbusch did.
All this comes out in standard biographies, but Evans magnifies them. But, yes, all of us have feet of clay and Rauschenbusch is no exception.
I keep posting on heroes and mentors at irregular times.
[...] 75. Rorty, one of the grandsons of the great Baptist prophet and theologian of the Social Gospel, Walter Rauschenbusch, grew up without any faith and maintained a somewhat cheerful atheism his entire life. [...]
[...] Gospel movement, dies. Though not without a few serious flaws in life and thought, he remains a personal hero and very large [...]
[...] birthday is also the anniversary of the death (in 1918 ) of that great Baptist theologian, Walter Rauschenbusch! I hope there is no significance to the [...]