Racism in Journalism: The “Is Obama Black Enough” Question
If anyone wonders whether or not racism is alive and well in 21st C. U.S.A., they only have to watch Tucker Carlson and an all-white MSNBC panel discuss Barack Obama’s “blackness” as a presidential issue. Yes, they did. Along with questioning whether Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM) was “the best representative” of U.S. Latinos. ¿Como? ¿Que? Say, what??
Thanks, folks, but I think I’ll judge my presidential candidates on their qualifications, character, and issue positions, not on whether some white folks think a bi-racial candidate is or is not “black enough,” what degree of “flavah” a Latino candidate must have to be “representative,” or what the “perfect embodiment” of a female candidate should be! Give me a break. These are the lengths the media will go to avoid discussing the issues in any kind of serious way.
I don’t recall anyone asking Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. about his “blackness,” when independents attempted to draft him (along with Dr. Benjamin Spock) to run a third party race for the presidency in ’68. Did anyone ask the light-skinned Julian Bond if he was “black enough” when he became the first African-American nominated for the U.S. Vice Presidency at the Democratic National Convention in ’68? (Bond declined the nomination because he wasn’t old enough to pass Constitutional muster. Look it up.) Did anyone ask Shirley Chisholm about her degree of “blackness” when she became the first African-American woman to run for president in 1972? Has Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton or former Sen. (and former U.S. Ambassador) Carol Mosely-Braun, presidential candidates all, been discussed for their “blackness?” When Republican leaders were seriously considering Colin Powell or Condoleeza Rice as presidential candidates (before they both became far too identified with Bush’s very unpopular foreign policies to have a chance at winning), did anyone stop and ask if they were “black enough?”
No. None of them. So, what’s the difference, now? Is it because the African-American community isn’t united around Obama’s candidacy? Don’t be absurd. The African-American community has never united around a single candidate, no matter his or her race or ethnicity. The assumption that it should do so is itself racist. No, the difference this time is that Obama has a real chance of winning–and that frightens certain power groups. Getting a compliant, entertainment-obsessed, media to discuss non-issues like Obama’s “blackness” (with brief forays into Richardson’s authenticity as a Latino and Clinton’s gender) is a subliminal playing of “the race card.”
I have not yet picked a primary candidate (6 months before the election year even begins!) and by the time I get to vote the field will be much smaller. As I have said repeatedly, I won’t endorse candidates on this blog. I am impressed with Richardson’s credentials and experience. If running for president were a job interview, he’d have it hands down. I don’t like Hillary Clinton’s economic or foreign policy views, which strike me as too close to Bush’s. I get mixed signals from Obama. Sometimes when he speaks, I get inspired and believe he could be a real healing force for the nation and the world. At other times, he also sounds too belligerant in foreign policy and too attached to neo-liberal economic policies (like Clinton and Bush).
The most progressive candidate is Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), but his chances for being on the ballot when I get to vote in the primary seem remote. Former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC), who did not impress me in ’04, seems by far to be the most progressive of the current frontrunners. No one is discussing his “whiteness,” or “maleness,” but they are avoiding serious discussion of his plans to eliminate poverty, provide universal healthcare, revitalize schools and labor by discussing–wait for it–his hair!!
Serious journalism isn’t dead in the U.S., but it certainly seems to be slipping into a coma.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.