Faith & Social Justice: In the spirit of Richard Overton and the 17th C. Levellers

David Fillingim: A New Voice in baptist Theology

david_fillingimMy friend, David Fillingim, currently Associate Professor of Philosophy, Shorter College, Rome, GA, will be annoyed to find himself listed as a “new voice” in baptist theology because he has always insisted that he “doesn’t believe in theology.” If you press him hard, he’ll break down and admit that what he really means is that he doesn’t believe in systematic theology. A native born Georgian (with a soft drawl that was pleasantly out of place amidst the twangier sounds of Kentucky when I knew David as a fellow Ph.D. student of Glen Stassen at SBTS in the early ’90s) with a Southerner’s Faulknerian sense of narrative, and tragedy, and the giveness of place and people, David knows that theology, like life, is too messy to come in neat systems–and so is God.  To me, that makes him a perfect candidate for this series of brief profiles of “not-yet-famous” voices in baptist/Believers’ Church life.

First, the bare facts. Born and raised in the absolutely beautiful seaside city of Savannah, GA, the son of a family physician, Fillingim grew up in the same kind of conservative-but-non-fundamentalist Baptist life that produced former U.S. President Jimmy Carter. He was cross-pollinated by  the more radical stream represented by Clarence Jordan and Koinonia Partners (Americus, GA) and Black Baptist life–during a childhood that saw segregation end, and teen years and adult life that never quite saw racism healed. (Glimpses of healing occur across the South, and across the nation, daily, but there are always setbacks.) He was educated at Mercer University (Macon, GA),  Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary (Wake Forest, NC), finishing his Master of Divinity there just as the fundamentalists took over that institution. He pursued his Ph.D. in Christian Ethics (under my own Doktorvater, Glen H. Stassen) at SBTS in Louisville, KY–even as the fundamentalists closed in on it. (David said he felt like Jonah, bringing darkness whereever he went!) His major influence include Clarence Jordan, Will D. Campbell, Morris Ashcraft, Elizabeth Barnes, Glen H. Stassen, Paul D. Simmons, Henlee H. Barnette, H. Richard Niebuhr, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Of Bonhoeffer, Fillingim has said that he finds it impossible just to relate to him on an intellectual level, always responding to Bonhoeffer as a novice contemplative responds to a spiritual guide. (There is another set of influences to which we’ll attend in a moment.)

After finishing his academic work, Fillingim taught for several years at Chowan College in North Carolina before coming to Shorter College. He has returned  to his home state of GA, but lives now at the opposite end (NW instead of SE) from his childhood home.

Fillingim has written or edited 3 books.  Extreme Virtues:  Living at the Prophetic Edge with a foreword by Glen H. Stassen  (Herald Press, 2003) is a contribution to “virtue ethics” or the “ethics of character” rooted in a study of the biblical prophets.  Too much of the literature of virtue ethics, even when written by Christians, is more indebted to the writings of Aristotle (and modern Aristotelians like Alisdair McIntyre) than  to the biblical literature, but Fillingim’s contribution is a welcome exception.  According to Fillingim, the virtues extolled by the biblical prophets are:  self-sacrifice, personal responsibility, justice, steadfast love, hope, courage, and peace.  I expect more in this line to come, perhapps from the Gospels, which, following Jesus himself, were deeply informed by the prophets.

Fillingim’s other two books show a second side to his scholarship:  the relation of Southern religion to aspects of Southern popular culture,  especially musical culture.  A guitarist himself, Fillingim wrote Redneck Liberation:  Country Music as Theology, Music and the American South series (Mercer University Press, 2003).  Here Fillingim stands in company with Methodist theologian Tex Sample in studying blue-collar culture for clues to its religious life. (See Tex Sample, White Soul:  Country Music, the Church, and Working Americans [Abingdon Press, 1996], and Tex Sample, Blue Collar Resistance and the Politics of Jesus:  Doing Ministry with Working Class Whites [Abingdon Press, 2006].) But Fillingim’s initial inspiration, other than the music itself, and the love of Country music by his icon, the maverick Baptist minister,  Will D. Campbell,  was Black Liberation theologian James H. Cone’s The Spirituals and the Blues (Orbis Books, 1972, rev. ed., 1992).  Fillingim centers on the “hillbilly humanism” of Hank Williams (Sr.), the eschatological hope portrayed in strands of Country music, and the tension between subordinationist and feminist strands among female Country artists.  I would like to have seen a chapter on the tension between strands of Country which glorify nationalism, militarism and violence (e.g., Toby Keith or Lee Greenwood) and those which resist these features of Southern  culture (e.g, John Denver, Johnny Cash, Willie Nelson).

Finally, to this point in the witness of this “new voice,” is More Than Precious Memories:  The Rhetoric of Southern Gospel Music, ed. Michael  P. Graves and David Fillingim (Mercer University Press, 2004).  This edited work is similar in genre to Redneck Liberation but concentrates on Southern Gospel– church approved Southern white music which stands in the same kind of tension with Country music as the Spirituals do with the Blues.  Graves and Fillingim co-wrote the introduction “More Than Precious Memories” and Fillingim’s chapters include “Oft Made to Wonder: Southern Gospel as Theodicy,” and Appendix: “Flight from Liminality: “Home” in Country and Gospel Music.”  In all these cases we see the recurring Fillingim theme that the distinctive music of Southern culture reflects and illuminates the best and worst of real lives of faith and doubt and brokeness and hope among working class white Southerners.

Fillingim clearly has a strong sense of place: These are my people, no matter what.  It is not uncritical and seeks change–away from the historic racism, sexism, heterosexism, militaristic nationalism, and violence of Southern culture.  But Fillingim’s loyalties to the South also lead him to see its best features and to feel that they are threatened by globalized mass market “culture” and the acids of both modernity and post-modernity.  His is a theology of resistance and hope–that speaks and sings with a soft patrician Georgian drawl. Like Hank Williams, sometimes Fillingim doubtless is “so lonesome [he] could cry,” but is sustained because he “saw the Light.”

Here is a baptist theological voice from the South to watch closely for more to come.


August 29, 2009 - Posted by | anabaptists, Baptists, ethics, theology


  1. […] David Fillingim: A New Voice in baptist Theology Share and Enjoy: […]

    Pingback by David Fillingim: A New Voice in baptist Theology | Free Student Scholarship | August 29, 2009

  2. Very informative, Michael! Thanks for sharing.

    Comment by haitianministries | August 30, 2009

  3. Shorter College is my alma mater !

    Comment by Paul | September 1, 2009

  4. Well, Paul, I just found out that your alma mater has decided that David Fillingim is too liberal (or something) for the Religion and Philosophy Dept. and shifted him to the Psychology Dept. because his Ph.D. had a minor concentration on Psych. of Religion!

    Comment by Michael Westmoreland-White | September 1, 2009

  5. Hmmm . . . I guess there’s more than one way to get rid of a tenured professor 😦

    Comment by haitianministries | September 1, 2009

  6. It makes you wonder, though, what’s so subversive about country music and gospel music that a scholar of those genres could actually be branded as a liberal? And why did they only NOW decide that he was liberal after serving for years on the Shorter faculty? Didn’t anyone actually read his work before giving him tenure?

    Comment by haitianministries | September 1, 2009

  7. If he is a good teacher that is what is important to me. I could care less if he is liberal or conservative – just be competent .

    Comment by Paul | September 1, 2009

  8. I am not sure that Shorter has a tenure policy. Many Christian liberal arts colleges have no tenure and even very weak contracts.

    Comment by Michael Westmoreland-White | September 2, 2009

  9. You might tell that to Shorter. David doesn’t want to be in the Psych dept. and would love to be back to Religion and Philosophy. Meanwhile, he’s looking for another teaching gig. Shorter is about to lose a fine scholar and cultural critic.

    Comment by Michael Westmoreland-White | September 2, 2009

  10. Oh the woes of academe. I agree that my alma mater should try to keep him on its faculty !

    Comment by Paul | September 2, 2009

  11. I sense a trend 😦

    Comment by Aaron Werner | September 11, 2009

  12. Well, Aaron, if you mean this is the start of a series of such profiles, you’re right! But why the sad face?

    Comment by Michael Westmoreland-White | September 12, 2009

  13. The trend I sensed is the “darkness” following David. I wonder if the fundies would “take over” Baylor if David went there.

    Comment by Aaron Werner | September 12, 2009

  14. No, because Baylor already made itself takeover proof. Many of the larger Baptist colleges and universities that have been controlled by the SBC, took steps in the ’90s to make their trustees (regents, etc.) freestanding–denying the SBC the chance to stack them with fundamentalists. That’s what they did to the seminaries in the ’80s and early ’90s and how they took them over.

    I’m not sure that fundamentalists have taken over Shorter. I am not sure what they found controversial about Fillingim’s work. But he is looking to move, now that they shunted him to psychology and his daughters are off in college.

    Comment by Michael Westmoreland-White | September 12, 2009

  15. If you know of a job for David, email him at Shorter!

    Comment by kaye | September 26, 2009

  16. Yeah, and his friend, Michael, could use one, too!

    Comment by Michael Westmoreland-White | September 26, 2009

  17. You are wrong to use the word ‘Fundamentalist’ please give a better description than that. Shorter is described as a christian baptist college. My question to you would also be how would you define “christian” and “baptist”?

    Comment by Rev. John Geaney | November 17, 2009

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: